Maple 2022 Questions and Posts

These are Posts and Questions associated with the product, Maple 2022

I am trying to use the symbol Delta in front of a symbol to denote a change in the variable in Maple 2022.For exmaple Q':=Q+Delta_Q; But I can't figure out how to denote it: Delta_Q does not seem to work as it displays a literal "Delta_Q".

Hi,

I was running Maple 2022.2 on Windows 11 and now I am using Linux Mint. I ran into something today that doesn't work as expected on LM. I thought it did on Windows, but now I am not so sure.

At any rate, I am unable to browse large vectors or matrices with more than 10001 rows. I looked for a setting that lets me change it, but I can't find one. The data is there--I can plot it and export it, but I can't browse it.

Any thoughts? Thanks.

Cheers,

Jno.

I have generated the regional plot, but the boundaries between the regions are not clearly marked. How can I highlight the boundaries using a black line or a black dashed line, similar to the example image? What syntax should I use? I have attached my generated image file.

Regional_new.mw


I would like to plot multiple curves in a single graph with proper legends for different values of θ, similar to the sample figure. However, I am encountering an error while generating the legend. What modifications should I make to correct this? Additionally, how can I display labels such as θ=0.4, θ=0.5 etc., directly inside the plot as shown in the sample?

Graph_legend_error.mw

When I solve for Pr and q simultaneously using Maple, I obtain a solution that differs from my manual derivation. I suspect there may be an issue with the solve function or the way it is specified. Could anyone please suggest how this can be corrected?
Manually solving q* = (Cv-Cd+Ce*tau-Ci)/(4Cr-t) which is different from maple results.

Sheet:Question_1.mw

How can I display numerical values alongside a plot as shown in the sample below? What is the syntax?

Q_legend.mw

I want to present my regional plot similar to the sample shown, using appropriate legends and labels. What syntax should I use to achieve this? Also, the axis labels need to be clear and bold, as they currently appear faded. What modifications should I make in the syntax?

Q1.mw

SAMPLE:

I would like to express the decision variables Pn_W,w_W,Ce_W,i1_W,Pn_D,w_D,Ce_D...other variables...​ in a compact form. Since their analytical expressions are lengthy, I want to identify terms and define appropriate composite parameters to simplify their representation.

Q_shorten_1.mw

For example ,  Suppose the original expression is: q := ((Cn - a)^2 + (P - d - b)*x^2 + Cn - a - b)/y(Cn - a)^2

Lets say Cn - a =X , P - d - b =S

Then the expression can be rewritten as: q = (X^2 + S*x^2 + X - b)/yX^2

I’m having trouble solving this. Any suggestions would be helpful.

NULL

restart

``

with(Optimization); with(plots); with(Student[VectorCalculus]); with(LinearAlgebra)

``

ineq := simplify((Cr*rho0*t*(Cr*alpha*b-alpha-1)*d^2+((alpha*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c+3*t-2*Pr)*Cr*b+((g*i2-a)*Cr-2*Crm-2*c-2*t+2*Pr)*alpha+(g*i2-a)*Cr-2*t)*rho0+(2*(Cr*b-1))*(sigma*t+Cn-Pr+delta-1))*d+(alpha*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c+2*t-2*Pr)*b+2*g*i2-2*a)*rho0+2*b*(sigma*t+Cn-Pr+delta-1))^2 > (((alpha*Cr*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c-2*Pr)*b+((g*i2-a)*Cr-2*Crm-2*c+2*Pr)*alpha-(-g*i2+a)*Cr)*rho0+(2*(Cr*b-1))*(delta+Cn-Pr-1))*d+(alpha*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c-2*Pr)*b+2*g*i2-2*a)*rho0+2*b*(delta+Cn-Pr-1))^2)

(((alpha*Cr*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c-2*Pr)*b+((g*i2-a)*Cr-2*Crm-2*c+2*Pr)*alpha-(-g*i2+a)*Cr)*rho0+2*(Cr*b-1)*(delta+Cn-Pr-1))*d+(alpha*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c-2*Pr)*b+2*g*i2-2*a)*rho0+2*b*(delta+Cn-Pr-1))^2 < (Cr*rho0*t*(Cr*alpha*b-alpha-1)*d^2+((alpha*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c+3*t-2*Pr)*Cr*b+((g*i2-a)*Cr-2*Crm-2*c-2*t+2*Pr)*alpha+(g*i2-a)*Cr-2*t)*rho0+2*(Cr*b-1)*(sigma*t+Cn-Pr+delta-1))*d+(alpha*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c+2*t-2*Pr)*b+2*g*i2-2*a)*rho0+2*b*(sigma*t+Cn-Pr+delta-1))^2

(1)

  

``extra := indets(ineq,And(name,Not(constant))) >~ 0;

{0 < Cn, 0 < Cr, 0 < Crm, 0 < Pr, 0 < a, 0 < alpha, 0 < b, 0 < c, 0 < d, 0 < delta, 0 < g, 0 < i2, 0 < rho0, 0 < sigma, 0 < t}

(2)

 

(solve({ineq}, t) assuming extra[]);

 

``

Download Q_solve.mw

I require the condition for equations  C1<C2<C4​, with all parameters strictly positive and subject to the constraint t > t1​.
I want to solve for the variables t and s. Specifically, what are the analytical conditions on t that ensure C2>C1​, and what are the analytical conditions on s that ensure C4 > C2 >C1​ ?

I attempted to solve this , but I keep encountering errors.
Q_solving_t_and_s.mw

In the plot shown below, one of the axes is not visible, and one of the lines inside the graph is also missing. Is there an error in the plotting syntax that is causing this issue? Could anyone please identify the mistake and suggest how to correct it

All_plots_Question.mw

I am facing three issues while plotting my plot.I need help modifying the syntax:

  1. I am unable to correctly display superscripts and subscripts for Pi[m]^WD < Pi[m]^D inside the graph region

  2. I cannot format the subscript for i__2 on the x-axis.

  3. A horizontal dotted line appears parallel to the x-axis at y=0.5; how can I remove this line?

    Question_1_regional.mw

In my Maple program, the voltage output of the system is computed as a time-domain response under different time intervals. The response curve has already been successfully obtained and plotted.

However, I would like to further extract and plot the envelope of this response. I initially attempted to determine the envelope by identifying the extrema of the signal, i.e., by solving the condition that the time derivative of the response equals zero. Unfortunately, this approach consistently leads to error messages, and I am not sure whether the issue is related to symbolic differentiation, numerical noise, or the implementation itself.

Could anyone please advise on:

  1. The correct way to extract an envelope curve from a time-domain signal in Maple?

  2. Whether there are alternative or more robust methods (e.g., based on numerical post-processing, signal processing techniques, or built-in Maple tools) to obtain the envelope, especially for numerically computed responses?

Any suggestions or example commands would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you in advance for your help.
numsolve-1229.mw

How can we determine the solution of the  system

Udot1 := -beta*V;
Vdot1 := beta*U;
Pdot1 := Q;
Qdot1 := 0;

and with initial conditions 

 U(0) := U[0];
V(0) := V[0];
P(0) := P[0];
Q(0) := Q[0];

Ode1.mw

In this maple file i try to find normal form and limit cycle of this jerk system but l don't know find like a paper did?

av.mw

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Last Page 1 of 44